Perceptions of Siraiki Ethnolinguistic Community regarding Ethnolinguistic Vitality of Siraiki Language in Comparison with Dominant Languages in Pakistan

Authors

  • Dr. Furrakh Abbas Allama Iqbal Open University, Islamabad
  • Dr. Siti Jamilah Bidin School of Languages, Civilization and Philosophy, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Kedah, Malaysia

Keywords:

Ethnolinguistic vatality, Status, Support, Dominant language

Abstract

The current study aims at investigating the perceptions of Siraiki ethnolinguistic community regarding the ethnolinguistic vitality of Siraiki language in comparison with dominant languages like Urdu and Punjabi in Pakistan. Ethnolinguistic vitality has emerged as a prominent area of research in sociolinguistics and scholars cite the effect of globalization and trending mobilities as major reasons for its popularity. The model of ethnolinguistic vitality was presented by Bourhis, Giles and Taylor (1981) to study the ethnolinguistic vitality of ethnic minority languages. The current research is quantitative in nature in which questionnaire adapted from Bourhis, Giles and Taylor (1981) has been used as a research instrument to collect data. The data has been collected from a sample of 392 Siraiki native speakers to explore the ethnolinguistic vitality of Siraiki language. The findings revealed that the ethnolinguistic vitality of Urdu language was higher on the dimension of status, support, general vitality and one aspect of demographic strength, however, on the other aspect of demographic strength, the ethnolinguistic vitality of Punjabi language was found higher. Thus, it could be concluded that the Siraiki ethnolinguistic community perceived that the ethnolinguistic vitality of Siraiki was low and there was need to take radical steps to improve the scenario of Siraiki ethnolinguistic community.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abbas, F. and Iqbal, Z. (2018). Language Attitude of the Pakistani Youth towards English, Urdu and Punjabi: A Comparative Study. Pakistan Journal of Distance and Online Learning, 4 (1), 199-214.

Asif, S. I. (2005). Siraiki: a sociolinguistic study of language desertion. (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation,Lancaster University).

Bourhis, R. Y., Giles, H., & Rosenthal, D. (1981). Notes on the construction of a ‘subjective vitality questionnaire’ for ethnolinguistic groups. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 2 (2), 145-155.

Crystal, D. (2003). English as a Global Language (2nd Ed). New York: Cambridge University Press.

David, M. K., Ali, M., and Baloch, G.M. (2017). Language shift or maintenance: The case of the Sindhi language in Pakistan. Language Problems and Planning, 41 (1), 26 –45.

Ehala, M. (2010). Refining the notion of ethnolinguistic vitality. International Journal of Multilingualism, 7(4), 363-378.

Giles, H., Bourhis, R.Y. and Taylor, D.M. (1977) Towards a theory language in ethnic group relations. In H. Giles (Ed.) Language, Ethnicity and Intergroup relations (pp. 307-348). London: Academic Press.

Government of Pakistan. (2001). Census report of Pakistan. Islamabad: Population Census Organization, Statistics Division, Government of Pakistan.

Hudyma, K. (2012). Language maintenance and shift: Case study of Ukrainian in Saskatchewan (Doctoral dissertation, University of Saskatchewan).

Jenkins, J. (2007). English as a Lingua Franca: Attitude and Identity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Jumani, N. B., Rahman, R., Rahman, F., & Iqbal, J. M., (2011). Effects of Native Language Saraiki on English Language Pronunciation, International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2(8), 60-70.

Kasatkina, N. (2011). Language Shift and Maintenance among Russian immigrants from the former Soviet Union. The Arizona Working Papers in Second Language Acquisition and Teaching, 18, 35-54.

McCombs, M. (2018). Setting the agenda: Mass media and public opinion. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Mughal, S, (2004). Aao Sariki Parhoon tay Saraiki Likhoon. Multan: Jhoke Publishers. O'Rourke, B. (2005). Attitudes towards minority languages: An investigation of young people's attitudes towards Irish and Galician. (Unpublished Doctoral dissertation, Dublin City University).

Rahman, T. (2011). Language and Politics in Pakistan. Karachi: Oxford University press.

Roofi, Y., and Alqama, K. (2013). Ethnic Dilemma in Pakistan and Division of Punjab: End Beginning of a New Era of Conflict. Journal of Politics and Law., 6 (1), 156-162.

Shackle, C. (1976). The Siraiki language of central Pakistan: A reference grammar. London: School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London.

Tsunoda, T. (2017). Language endangerment and language revitalization: An introduction. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.

Wang, X., and Chong, S. L. (2011). A hierarchical model for language maintenance and language shift: Focus on the Malaysian Chinese community. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 32(6), 577-591.

Yagmur, K. and Ehala, M. (2011). Tradition and Innovation in the Ethnolinguistic Vitality theory, Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 32(2), 101-110, DOI 10.1080/01434632.2010.541913.

Yagmur, K. (1997). First language attrition among Turkish speakers in Sydney. Tilburg: Tilburg University Press.

Yagmur, K. (2009). Language use and ethnolinguistic vitality of Turkish compared with the Dutch in the Netherlands. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 30(3), 219-233.

Zaidi, A. (2016). Ethnolinguistic Vitality of Punjabi in Pakistan: a GIDS approach. Journal of Language and Literature Review, 2(1), 15-29

Downloads

Published

2023-09-30

How to Cite

Abbas, F., & Bidin, S. J. (2023). Perceptions of Siraiki Ethnolinguistic Community regarding Ethnolinguistic Vitality of Siraiki Language in Comparison with Dominant Languages in Pakistan. Competitive Social Science Research Journal, 4(2), 38–52. Retrieved from https://cssrjournal.com/index.php/cssrjournal/article/view/464